Monthly Archives: February 2015

An Opinion On Why Some Power Couple Marriages Succeed, Some Marriages Fail – by Gary S. Smolker

 

Updated March 8, 2015

 

Relationships

You need a team to make your dream come true.

My Definition of A Good Relationship

Each person should receive something entirely good and loving from the other in a relationship.

Each person should learn from the other as well as contributing in many ways to their sense of well being.

The Impact of Social Environment

In order to achieve excellence in any domain requires a lot of hard work – think of pushing an elephant uphill.

Marriage is no different.

Consider the “temper of the times” we are living in.

We are living amidst a world-wide evolution of “woman’s rights” and in the midst of an ongoing “woman’s rights” revolution.

Marriage is a particularly complicated topic for educated ambitious women to deal with – so much so that the December 2014 issue of the “Harvard Business Review” has an article entitled “Rethink What You ‘Know’ About High Achieving Women.”

That article attempts to explain how “high achieving” women feel about marriage and the impact marriage has had on their lives and careers, and describes what the authors call the plight of high achieving women.

Below is a copy of an email in which I am asked why marriages between high-powered people fail, which I recently received from a friend (Friend #1).

I would love to read anything you would like to tell me about your opinions and ideas and answers to that question.

When I forwarded Friend #1’s email (copy below) to another friend (Friend #2), Friend # 2 responded: “The secret to a successful marriage is to give more than you take.”

I invite your comments on these topics and on the discussion which follows.

Thanks.

Gary

Gary S. Smolker, Publisher
The Gary Smolker Idea Exchange Blog
www.garysmolker.wordpress.com

 

See Answer Which Follows Question Below

—–Original Message—–
From: FRIEND
To: Gary Smolker <gsmolker@aol.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 6, 2015 7:53 am
Subject: RE: Life Is Full of Interesting Questions

What about the related question of life-partner decisions, what is the recipe for success?   Is there too much put societal pressure to “save” a marriage relationships, for the sake of the kids?  I know couples with kids that can’t afford to get divorced;

 

Are many of us too selfish in their “needs”?  I know many 45-55 woman who simply can’t understand why a 55-65 man would be with a 30-year-old woman.  They are essentially saying that they were not relatively evolved at age 30 and now are interesting and fun.  Should life-partners have the same hobbies, like the same music and art, have the same friends?  Joint checking accounts probably aren’t a good idea because men cannot appreciate what it costs to be woman; what can a stay at home mom do after the kids leave the nest?

 

Being now age 50 (almost 51), I know now so many seemingly perfect couples that have split in the past five years, leaving children ages 8 to 17 in the relationship debris.  These couples met in college.  They were all physically attractive then and now.  All were smart with both spouses have advanced degrees, from top  universities.  The couples each seemed like well-matched power couple couples when I met them in their early thirties.  Now 15 or so years later, the relationships ended, leaving hurt spouses and complicated relationships for their children to navigate.

 

What about couples that can’t afford to get divorced?

————————————-

MY RESPONSE:

FRIEND,

There is no such a thing as a “formula” or “recipe” for success in a relationship, in marriage or in any other relationship.

There is no single “linear process” that leads to “success.”

Successful relationships require you to consider not only your own interests and needs but also those of other party or parties, your counterparts.

People’s needs and interests are a moving target, they change over time.

Your chance of having success in your relationship(s) will increase to the extent you understand your counterpart’s thoughts, feelings and motives, intentions and interests and focus on the big picture, i.e. to the extent that each person in a relationship focuses on what each person is trying to accomplish.

Ask yourself the and ask your friends to ask themselves the following questions:

  • Do you understand your counterpart’s point of view?
  • Do you understand your counterpart’s motivation?
  • Do you understand your counterpart’s goals?
  • Do you understand your counterpart’s priorities?
  • Do you understand your counterpart’s needs?
  • Do you know what is on your counterpart’s mind?
  • Do you understand what is on your counterpart’s mind?
  • Do you understand what is important to your counterpart.
  • Do you understand how your counterpart thinks?
  • Do you understand your counterpart’s situational constraints – your counterpart’s level of power, skill, savy, time, energy and responsibilities?
  • Do you understand how your counterpart feels, and perceives the current situation?
  • Do you understand how your counterpart understands the choices ahead?
  • Do the your friends trust each other?

MY RECOMMENDATION:

If you want to find an explanation, at why your friend’s marriages failed look at “root causes.”

Answer the following questions about your friends’ “failed marriages.”

  • Did the couple have the same goals?
  • Do they presently have the same goals?
  • Did they want the same outcomes?
  • Do they want the same outcomes now?
  • Did they respect each other?
  • Do they respect each other now?
  • Did they understand each other’s thoughts, feelings and motives?
  • Do they understand each other’s thoughts, feelings, motives and intentions now?
  • Did one of them make the other feel bad about something the other person enjoys?
  • Did one of them believe that their time was more important than the other person’s time?
  • Does one of them now believe that their time is more important than the other person’s time?
  • Did one of them not agree with the other person’s life style?
  • Did they understand each other’s level of power, skill, savvy, responsibilities, time availability, level of energy and other situational constraints?
  • Does either one of them feel inadequate?
  • Do they understand how the other person in their relationship feels, perceives and understands the choices ahead?
  • Have they talked to each other about any of the topics listed above?

Was there a common thread that linked them together?

Is there a common thread that links them together now?

Did they support each other emotionally?

Do they support each other emotionally now?

  • On the one hand, I’ve read that the emotional support of your partner is the best predictor of success in terms of your subjective well-being.  The reasons being:
  1. In personal relationships it helps if your partner values your projects and vice versa.
  2. The best predictor of relational success is the extent to which you share your personal projects and give emotional support to each other.  On another hand, I’ve read a second article which states that a dutiful spouse can boost your career.
  • In the second article the authors unequivocally state that the only spousal trait that is important to your work outcomes is conscientiousness.

According to the second article the conscientiousness of your spouse is/will be a solid predictor of your income, job promotions, and job satisfaction, regardless of gender (and regardless of your own degree of conscientiousness).  The reasons given being:

  1. Conscientious spouses handle a lot of the household chores and planning, freeing their partners to concentrate on their jobs or simply to recharge.
  2. People who have conscientious spouses typically feel more satisfied in their marriages and therefore have more mental energy to devote to their work.

The authors of the second article qualify the above statements by saying, this doesn’t mean that your success depends on your being in a relationship. “Plenty of single people shine at work, of course, and plenty of effective business leaders are unattached.”

In terms of going forward with life, I believe you can’t change the past.

I also think you have to depend on yourself.  You are responsible for you.

I believe in taking risks.

In that regards, I like the following quote from J. K. Rowling:

It is impossible to live without failing, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which case you have failed by default.  — J. K. Rowling, author

Keep in mind the environment in which we, they, and you live.

We are living in the midst of a civil rights movement in which many women are vigorously striving for “equality” with men.

Women feel they have been subjugated and they resent it.

Women want to be with men who “respect” women.

Women do not want to be with a man who they believe does not “respect” women.

Many women say they want to be treated as “equals,” i.e., they want equal job opportunities, equal career opportunities, to get “equal pay” for “equal work” and an equal division of labor and responsibilities in their relationship with a man.

Women are aghast at how few women have top leadership positions in the business world and in society.

They are aghast at how widespread domestic violence is, they are also aghast that society does not and/or cannot protect them from abuse, sexual harassment and/or domestic violence.

Many single women have told me they think the intimidate men.

Many men and women have told me they feel that the deck is stacked against men in the legal system and consequently men do not want to get married.

Many people have told me young men do not want to marry because they see what happened to men/husbands in divorce proceedings.

Many single men and many married men have told me they feel they are being treated by a woman like an ATM (a cash dispensing machine) and resent being treated that way.

Both the marriage rate and the fertility rate are down in developed countries.

Social change is in the air.

Consider the “temper of the times.”

Social foment is everywhere.

We are surrounded by social foment and social protest “everywhere.”

THE GSS RELATIONSHIP INDEX

I use the following index to measure the state of a relationship: (a) add up the number of compliments, (b) add up the number of complaints and (c) divide by the number of complements by the number of complaints.

If there are more complaints than compliments there is a problem.

If there are more compliments than complaints you are in a good relationship.

The above formula can be refined as follows:

  • Some complaints deserve a higher ranking than other complaints.  Give them a higher weight (a higher number than “one”) depending on how significant those complaints are to you.
  • Some compliments deserve a higher ranking than other compliments. Give them a higher weight ( a higher number higher than “one”) depending on how significant and sincere those compliments are/appear to be to you.
  • Give more or less weight to each compliment and each complaint at your discretion.

I use the above formula as a rough approximation of the state of any relationship.

Have firm principles, expound them clearly, act upon them decisively; set goals, make a detailed plan of action to reach them and keep in mind the following thoughts:

  1. “You must have long-range goals to keep you from being frustrated by short-term failures.” – Charles Noble, military leader
  2. “To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.” – Winston Churchill, British prime minister
  3. “When you have exhausted all possibilities, remember this – you haven’t.” – Thomas Edison, inventor
  4. “Don’t find fault, find a remedy.” – Henry Ford, industrialist
  5. “A man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life.” – Muhammad Ali, World Champion Boxer

The value of relationships are unlocked incrementally over time, through on the job learning.

Learning as a couple from your errors will turn your errors into stepping-stones to success.

MY THOUGHT FOR THIS MORNING IS:

To achieve understanding, it is necessary not to see many things, but to look hard at what you do see.

Going Forward

You need a team to make your dreams come true.

Good luck and best wishes,

Gary

The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club

I’ve started a “Thoughtful Person Club.”

To join “The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club” send your name and e-mail address to me at my e-mail Internet address GSmolker@aol.com.

According to WordPress, in 2014, people in 108 different countries viewed the “Gary S. Smolker Idea Exchange Blog” at http://www.garysmolker.wordpress.com.

 

Copyright © 2015 by Gary S. Smolker

 

 

 

The Frantic Urge to Soar Portrayed in Current Movies and in Real Life Today – by Gary S. Smolker

—See email exchange below.

–Original Message—–
From: Gary Smolker <gsmolker@aol.com>
To:
Sent: Fri, Feb 20, 2015 11:53 am
Subject: The Frantic Urge To Soar

Friend,

“One can never consent to creep when one feels an impulse to soar.” – Helen Keller, writer

Above is a critical high energy quote I offer in rebuttal to your quote below.
Below is a brief description of four currently playing motion pictures in which the main characters (heroes and heroines) “felt an impulse to soar.”
Each of these movies has been nominated to win the Academy Award for Best Picture in 2014.
Also, below is a recital of a brief conversation I had this morning with a young man who feels “an impulse to soar.”
FOUR 2014 ACADEMY AWARD BEST PICTURE NOMINEES DEPICTING HEROES WHO HAD AN UNSTOPPABLE IMPULSE TO SOAR
The proof of Helen Keller’s statement about one feeling “an impulse to soar” is dramatically presented in current Academy Award nominees for Best Picture:
  1. “Whiplash” – In this motion picture we see what being “unstoppable means” (what happens) when both a jazz ensemble conductor and an aspiring drummer have an unstoppable urge to soar.  They put on a world-class musical performance.
  2. “The Theory of Everything” – In this motion picture we see what being “unstoppable means” when a man loses his ability to speak because his vocal cords don’t work and he has an unstoppable urge to soar in spite of that.  He learns to “speak” by raising an eyebrow which gets converted into a letter which spells out a word which is converted by a machine into speech which allows him to give lectures and write a book which sells over 10 million copies.
  3. “American Sniper” – In this motion picture we see what being unstoppable means when an “old man” (a thirty year old man) decides to become a Navy Seal because he wants to protect his country and has an unstoppable urge to soar in protecting his country which takes him to four tours of duty as a Navy Seal in Iraq and Afghanistan. The man becomes a legend, the most deadly sniper in the history of the American Armed Forces.
  4. “The Imitation Game” – We see what happens when a man with the unstoppable urge to solve an unsolvable problem (to break a secret Nazi Code being used in World War II) and the impulse to soar keeps going after facing one obstacle and disappointment after another.  Winston Churchill opined that as a result of this man’s work the War in Europe was shortened by two to four years and that this man made the single most and largest contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
BREAKFAST THIS MORNING
 
I spoke to a 20-year-old man this morning (whose current job is making Turkish Coffee at Aroma Cafe & Bakery in Encino, California) about his long-term ambition.
 
He told me he has always wanted to be a “cop.” 
 
I asked him, “Why do you want to be a cop?”
 
He replied, “Because, I want to protect my community.”
 
I asked him if he was aware that people “kill cops”,  if he becomes a cop he might be killed by a bad person?
 
He replied, “That would be okay because if I died I would die while doing what I wanted to be doing.”
 
He is currently (a) working at a cafe making coffee, (b) going to college and (c) applying for a job as a “cop.”
 
Best regards,
 
Gary
—–Original Message—–
From:
To: Gary Smolker <gsmolker@aol.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 20, 2015 7:56 am
Subject:NidoQubein

SmartQuote

Your present circumstances don’t determine where you can go; they merely determine where you start.”
— Nido Qubein,
businessman and motivational speaker

The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club

I’ve started a “Thoughtful Person Club.”

To join “The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club” send you name and e-mail address to me at my e-mail Internet address GSmolker@aol.com.

According to WordPress, in 2014, people in 108 different countries viewed the “Gary S. Smolker Idea Exchange Blog” at http://www.garysmolker.wordpress.com.

Copyright © 2015 by Gary S. Smolker

Accuracy, Truth and Pictorial Reality in the Story told in “The Imitation Game” – notes of a conversation with Benedict Cumberbatch and Keira Knightley – by Gary S. Smolker

February 17, 2015 (4:30 A.M., PST)

Last night I attended “A conversation with Benedict Cumberbatch and Keira Knightley” sponsored and organized by “The New York Times” and The Toronto International Film Festival.

Below is a copy of the email correspondence that I initiated after that.

I have a lot more to say about Benedict Cumberbatch and “The Imitation Game.”

Best regards,

Gary

Gary S. Smolker, Publisher

Gary S. Smolker Idea Exchange Blog

http://www.garysmolker.wordpress.com

 

———————————————————————————

Tuesday, February 17, 2015 (4:30 a.m., PST)

Jorge,
Confirming we are meeting for brunch today at Solley’s in Van Nuys at 11:30 a.m.
I think if we videotaped our conversation and then uploaded it to YouTube that would be a public service.
One of the big topics during the conversation last night was “truth” – the accuracy of the story told in the movie “The Imitation Game.”
Keira Knightley’s answer to that question was spell binding.
Benedict Cumberbatch’s answer to that question was spell-binding and brilliant.
I wanted to jump out of my seat and tell everyone on the stage (Knightley, Cumberbatch and Buckley) what Jose Ortega y Gasset said about psychological mechanics in his many essays and books.
 
By means of ideas we see the world.  
 
We possess of reality nothing but the ideas we have succeeded in forming about it.
Any way, you and I are experts in the way the truth is told.
 
I am sure the “elite” and those who think they belong to the “elite” would love to hear what we have to say about that.
 
I will be taking notes at our brunch today.
 
I wish our conversation at brunch was videotaped and then uploaded to YouTube.
 
By the way, here is what Jose Ortega y Gasset said about “art”: The aim of painting is to furnish a fuller and more complete view of things than can be obtained in the ordinary intercourse with them.
 
In essence that/this is how both Knightley and Cumberbatch answered the question –
  • Knightley – There are time constraints, i.e., the length of the movie.
  • Cumberbatch – People go to see films about reality, not literal truth but a narrative journey that gets to the truth.  Films are a “pictorial reality” that create a deeper understanding of the truth.
I could go on and on and on.
 
And, I am sure both of us will during our brunch today.
 
During the conversation, Cumberbatch said his goal is, “to honor the legacy we are passing on.”
 
Cumberbatch made one absolutely brilliantly astute comment after another during the conversation.
 
By the way, I posted my article on “The Upside of Feeling Down” on my blog, “The Gary S Smolker Idea Exchange Blog” at www.garysmolker.wordpress.com yesterday afternoon.
 
See you soon.
 
Gary

—–Original Message—–
From: Lou
To: Gary Smolker <gsmolker@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Feb 16, 2015 11:29 pm
Subject: Re: Going Forward

“. . I found myself wishing I could join in the “conversation” to add a lot of pertinent information to his answers that would give him a better grasp of the big picture.”
 
Indeed Gary, the public conversation has been democratized and the old legacy media sources have been watching their privileged status get eroded by more dynamic and responsive voices who aren’t restricted by the social feudalism of  the New York Big Media dinosaurs or their equally slow cousins in the Hollywood Media Sycophant Industrial Complex.
BTW Mr. Cumberbatch is currently my favorite actor and I make it a point to see whatever picture he’s in.

From: Gary Smolker <gsmolker@aol.com>
To: Eric and Lou
Cc: Jorge and Jason
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:36 PM
Subject: Going Forward

Eric and Lou,

 
It is 10:25 p.m.

I just got home from a program moderated by Cara Buckley consisting of a conversation with Benedict Cumberbatch and Keira Knightley followed by a Q and A.
Based on what I observed, I agree with both of you regarding your estimation of my potential as a reporter, an interviewer, a moderator, a speaker and a writer — compared to Cara Buckley who is a culture reporter for the New York Times and the new Carpetbaggger, covering the campaigns, events and general hoopla that make up Hollywood’s film award season.
By the way:
  1. Benedict Cumberbatch is an absolutely brilliant and articulate person.
  2. From my perspective and for my benefit, the program/conversation was well worth attending.
Tomorrow I will be having brunch with my brilliant articulate friend Jorge Uribe.
I wish Cumberbatch would/could join us.
 
Jorge, Cumberbatch, and I could have a wonderful conversation.
 
Cumberbatch is brilliant.
 
Brilliant though his answers were — I found myself wishing I could join in the “conversation” to add a lot of pertinent information to his answers that would give him a better grasp of the big picture.
 
Cumberbatch was heads and shoulders above Buckley and Knightley tonight.
 
By the way, Keira told us it is true that she asked her parents for an “agent” when she was three years old and got an agent when she was six years old.
 
Keira has a lot of the mannerisms of my daughter Judi — but Judi is more articulate, more graceful, more charming, more poised and more energetic.
 
The sky is the limit.
 
Best regards,
 
Gary
Copyright © 2015 by Gary S. Smolker

I DON’T AGREE WITH THE STATEMENT “DON’T GET MAD.” – My Thoughts About The Upside of Feeling Down & Currently Playing Movies About Spectacular Achievements That Resulted from Hard Work Motivated by Getting Mad – by Gary S. Smolker

I DON’T AGREE WITH THE STATEMENT, “DON’T GET MAD.”

On Valentine’s day (February 14, 2015) a friend sent me (via e-mail) the following quote:

“Don’t get mad.  Don’t get even.  Get stronger and faster and more powerful.  Fill yourself with knowledge and empathy and an indomitable spirit.  Because no one else can do that for you.  In the end, its your life, your choice and your world.  Give 110% always.”  – Apolo Ohno, American Speed skater

I replied:

Thanks for sending me the quote.

That quote (copy above) is quite stimulating.

I disagree with the statement, “Don’t get mad.”

I am currently writing an article currently called something like THOUGHT ABOUT THE UPSIDE OF NEGATIVE EMOTIONS.

In that article I will mention that Martin Luther King, Jr. was so mad at the way black people were treated that he changed the world as a result of his actions as a civil rights leader.

Getting mad at injustice is a very natural thing that can have tremendous beneficial results for you personally, the rest of your country, and the rest of the world – – especially when getting mad motivates you (or someone else) to take action that results in bringing about positive change.

Why do you think President Harry Truman signed the order integrating the U.S. military forces in 1948?

President Truman integrated the military forces of the United States because President Truman was appalled at the way black soldiers who had fought for their country in World War II were being treated when they returned home to the United States.

He was mad.

Gary

Anger Motivates A Person to Take Action

Anger fuels social progress.

When you are mad you get a boost of energy – you are like a volcano ready to erupt.

Negative Emotions Are Critical to Success

To make their own lives more satisfying and to make this a better and more just world and to endure its challenges leaders have found it necessary to wisely engage their full range of negative emotions.

For example, anger stimulated and has sustained leaders of the civil rights and gender equality movements.

President Harry Truman’s Moral Clarity

When Harry Truman became president in April 1945, African-Americans might have had reason to fear setbacks because President Truman had grown up knowing few black people in Missouri, where all of his grandparents had owned slaves.

But, having been an officer in World War I, President Truman had respect for anyone who served his country in uniform.

During the demobilization of the military after World War II, President Truman was appalled to hear that African-American veterans were being brutally treated when they returned.

That made him angry.

That made President Truman so angry that in 1947, President Truman gave the first address by a president to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People since its founding in 1909.

In his speech, President Truman proposed anti-lynching legislation, the abolition of poll taxes that discouraged voting and an end to job discrimination.

At that time the lynching of black Americans in the South was widespread and very few, if any, black Americans were allowed to vote in the South.

In his speech President Truman linked the battle to advance those rights at home to the Cold War.

In his speech President Truman said, “Our case for democracy should be as strong as we can make it.  It should rest on practical evidence that we have been able to put our own house in order.”

President Truman then turned to the president of the NAACP and told him, “I mean every word of it [the speech he had just given], and I’m going to prove it.”

Thereafter, President Truman sent a series of measures to Congress to combat this, and when they didn’t pass, he, in his capacity as commander-in-chief, in 1948 issued orders which desegregated the armed forces and the civil service and another order in 1951 that banned discrimination in defense contracting.

Truman’s legislative initiatives to improve civil rights did not get through Congress, but he ignited a national debate that brought minority protection closer to reality.

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Audacity of Hope, Dr. King’s Dream, the Spectacle of Bloody Sunday and the Birth of the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Selma, Alabama, is the county seat of Dallas County.

The region was one of the capitals of American slavery, and long after the Civil War the area retained a black majority.

However, in 1964 only a handful of the county’s black residents could vote.  Whites controlled all 10 county commissions, 11 boards of education and 34 town governments.  Every judge was white, there were few black lawyers, and black residents were generally not allowed into the courthouse except to pay taxes.

White terrorists operated with the implicit sanction of both private and public authority.

In 1964 a locally grounded voting rights campaign began.

Dr. King decided to participate.  Soon after he arrived in Selma, he was arrested along with several thousand other protestors for parading without a permit and unlawful assembly.

While in jail in February 1965, King wrote a letter to the New York Times stating, “This is Selma, Alabama.  There are more Negroes in jail with me than there are on the voting rolls.”

After a 27-year-old black pulpwood cutter, was shot by troopers when he tried to protect his mother from the clubs of troopers breaking up a night vigil, young activists threatened to carry his dead body to Montgomery and present it to Governor George Wallace.

Local leaders converted the angry sentiments into a plan to walk to Montgomery from Selma to petition Wallace for the right to vote.

On a Sunday, in full view of TV cameras, those marchers (600 demonstrators demanding equal access to the voting booth) assembled on the outskirts of Selma.

As they approached the Edmund Pettus Bridge, which had been blocked by Alabama state troopers and white civilian volunteers deputized by Sheriff Clark, they were clubbed and whipped and tear gassed and chased off the bridge by State troopers and local police using electric cattle prods and bull whips.

Widespread public outrage erupted after video clips were shown on national TV.

What happened next?

President Johnson told a joint session of Congress:

“What happened in Selma is part of a far larger movement which reaches into every section and state of America.

“It is the effort of American Negroes to secure for themselves the full blessings of American life.  Their cause must be our cause too, because it is not just Negroes but really all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice.  And we shall overcome.”

President Johnson immediately proceeded to introduce voting legislation that King had pleaded for privately, and announced his plan of action in a joint session of Congress.

President Johnson placed Selma alongside Lexington and Concord and Appomattox as turning points where “history and fate meet at a single time in a single place” to shape our “unending search for freedom.”

Speaking “as a man whose roots go deeply into Southern soil,” Johnson told Congress: “There is no Negro problem.  There is no Southern problem.  There is no Northern problem.  There is only an American problem.”

Johnson told Congress that “the real hero of this struggle is the American Negro.”  “There cause must be our cause too.  Because it is not just Negroes, but really all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice.  And we shall overcome.”

On August 6, Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, providing for the registration by federal examiners in any state or county where fewer than half the adults were registered to vote.

All of the above is dramatized in the recently released movie “Selma.”

“Selma” is a reminder and wake-up call about what hatred, intolerance and oppression lead to and that the United States has gone through more than one “War of Morals.”

The movie “Selma” reminds us there is a future beyond lynchings, shootings, blood and bombs – a future that is far closer to reality now than appeared even remotely possible when 600 demonstrators demanding equal access to the voting booth assembled on the outskirts of Selma, Alabama and were clubbed and tear gassed by State troopers and local police when they tried to march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge.

For all of the above reasons, “Selma” is a must see movie.

Looking Back

If you are wondering if recent events might be a signal of the dawn of a new baptism of liberty, equality and freedom and of the end of human bondage, consider the following historical events.

  1. On June 11, 1963, after Alabama Governor George Wallace attempt to keep two black students from enrolling at the University of Alabama was televised, that night President John F. Kennedy went immediately on the air with an improvised speech to rally support for a civil rights bill that had yet to be written. “Those who do nothing,” the president told his audience, “are inviting shame, as well as violence.  Those who act boldly are recognizing right, as well as reality.”
  2. Around 9:30 p.m. on April 3, 1968 (shortly before he was murdered), Martin Luther King, Jr., in a speech he gave at Mason Temple, a Pentecostal church where at least 1000 people had gathered to hear him speak, said:
  • “If I were standing at the beginning of time – and [I] could choose my  lifetime – I would consider the glories of ancient Greece, Egypt and Rome.
  • But I wouldn’t stop there.  If you would allow me to live just a few years in the second half of the 20th century, I will be happy.”

King chose above all to see, and did see, the stirrings of a human-rights revolution for freedom worldwide.

Alan Turing’s Frustration

Winston Churchill said Alan Turing made the single biggest contribution to Allied victory in World War II against Nazi Germany.

Turing devised a number of techniques for breaking secret encoded German Navy messages to German U-boats.

It is estimated that Turning’s work shortened the word in Europe by as many as two to four years and saved ten million lives.

Turing was able to do this because he got mad at his boss and took the unprecedented step of going above his boss’ head to get support for his work.

Turning’s boss at the Britain’s codebreaking center thought Turing was nuts and Turing’s work was worthless, took steps to destroy a computer Turing had built (Turning is considered the father of computer science) and proceeded to try to “fire” Turing.

Breaking all rules, on October 28, 1941 Turing and his crew of codebreakers wrote directly to Churchill spelling out their difficulties.

The effect was electric.  Churchill wrote a memo to General Ismael – the military man in charge of the codebreaking center – which read: “ACTION TODAY.  Make sure they have all they want on extreme priority and report to me this has been done.”  

On November 18, 1941, the chief of the British Secret Service reported to Churchill every possible measure was being taken.

All of the above is dramatically portrayed in Norwegian Director Morten Tyldum’s film “The Imitation Game.”

“The Imitation Game” is nominated for eight Academy Awards, including best picture.

“The Imitation Game” is a must see movie.

Boris Spassky’s and Bobby Fischer’s Need for Silence

Absolute concentration, mania for maintaining focus and fanatical devotion to craft are necessary if you want to achieve extraordinary success.

American Director Ed Zwick picture “Pawn Sacrifice” shows how that comes into play.

“Pawn Sacrifice” takes the audience into the minds of the USSR’s world chess champion Boris Spassky and the American challenger Bobby Fischer as it follows their actions at the 1972 World Chess Championship in Reykjavik, Iceland.

After one game, played before an audience in an auditorium, Bobby Fischer refused to play any more games against Boris Spassky in the contest for World Chess Champion unless the rest of games were played in a basement ping-pong room without a live audience and without live coverage before a multitude of motion picture and TV cameras present in the auditorium during the prior game.

Fischer explained that the noise made by the live audience coughing, etc. and cameras and cameramen filming the contest was too distracting.  He was distracted by the noise of the cameras taking motion pictures.

The noise broke his concentration, destroyed his ability to focus on and think about his next move.

Rather than win the World Championship title by accepting Bobby Fischer’s forfeit as a result of Fischer’s refusal to play chess against him, Boris Spassky agreed to have the remaining games played in a basement.

After a next game was played in the basement, and won by Fischer, Spassky accused Fischer or someone else as having sabotaged the chair in which Spassky sat – made the chair “noisy” to break Spassky’s concentration while Spassky was playing.

Spassky’s chair was x-rayed.

Nothing was wrong with Spassky’s chair.

Later, after Fischer won the match and the World Championship, two dead flies were discovered in a light fixture above the chess set.

Spassky had been distracted by the sound of flies flying in that light fixture that only he could hear.

This movie is all about their lives, it is all about focus, concentration, mental preparation, planning.

Both men thought deeply, and planned and prepared mightily before they acted.

This movie is a peak into the minds of Grand Master Chess Players.

Stephen Hawking’s Disappointment

Dr. Stephen Hawking is and always has been an extrovert.

When Dr. Hawking was a young graduate student at Cambridge he was diagnosed as having motor neuron disease.

When he leaned he had motor neuron disease he was told he only had two years to live.

He told his girl-friend Jane Wilde to “go away.”

Stephen explained to Jane that he had only two more years to live and that he would lose his physical abilities over that time.

Jane replied: “Then lets enjoy all of those remaining moments of your life together.  I can’t go away because I love you.”

After that, Stephen Hawking didn’t let the facts that he had been told he only had two years to live and that he would lose all motor function get him down.

  1. He (Stephen Hawking) married her (Jane Wilde) while he was still a young graduate student at Cambridge.
  2. He (Stephen Hawking) went on to earn and received a Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics and became a member of the world renown faculty at Cambridge University.
  3. While earning his Ph.D. degree and afterwards, Dr. Hawking formulated/created breath-taking theories about the universe.
  4. When he lost control of his vocal cords he learned how, through a teacher arranged for him by his wife Jane, to communicate by raising his eye brow when he was shown a letter of a word he wanted to speak on a board.
  5. Later, a machine was invented (designed and built by third persons though the efforts of his wife) which converted Dr. Hawking’s “spelling” into speech.
  6. Although Professor Hawking couldn’t speak (because he eventually couldn’t control his vocal cords) he dictated a book (“A Brief History of Time”), which sold over 10 million copies.
  7. Dr. Hawking and his wife Jane Wilde had three children together.
  8. When this movie was recently made, Professor Stephen Hawking was over 70 years old.
  9. Professor Stephen Hawking is still alive.

Norwegian Director Morten Tyldum’s film “The Theory of Everything” accurately and dramatically portrays all of the above.

“The Theory of Everything” is nominated for five Academy Awards, including best picture.

“The Theory of Everything” is a must see movie.

Cheryl Strayed’s Self-Loathing

Cheryl Strayed hated herself for having destroyed her marriage by having random sex with strangers and being a heroine addict.

She decided to “clean” herself up by taking a solo 1,100-mile-hike along the Pacific Crest Trail.

It worked: She stopped being an addict, fell in love with a new man who became her husband and had children with him.

Chris Strayed’s life story is dramatically portrayed in Jean-Marc Vallee’s film “Wild” and is nominated for several Academy Awards.

“Wild” is a must see movie.

Chris Kyle’s Anger

Chris Kyle saw the Twin Towers in New York fall down on September 11 after terrorists fly hi-jacked airplanes into them.

That made Chris Kyle so mad that he joined the United States Navy.

Although he was 30 years old, he tried out for the Navy Seals.

The rest is history: Chris Kyle became the deadliest sniper in American history.

In that role Mr. Kyle saved the lives of countless  American serviceman in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mr. Kyle’s real life story is accurately and dramatically portrayed in Clint Eastwood’s film “American Sniper.”

“American Sniper” is a must see movie.

It has been nominated for six Academy Awards, including best picture.

Currently Playing Movies That Teach Good Behavior

WINNING TAKES MORE THAN JUST PUNCHING.

Winning Takes Adaptability, Advance Work, A High Energy Level, A Sense of Purpose, Authenticity, Being Alert At All Times, Courage, Curiosity, Creativity, Determination, Discipline, Drive, Endurance, Fortitude, Flexibility, Grit, Particular Personality Traits, Preparation, Seriousness, Being Teachable, Hard Work and Training to go the distance as portrayed by NORWEGIAN DIRECTOR MORTEN TYLDUM in “The Imitation Game”, portrayed by ENGLISH DIRECTOR JAMES MARSH in “The Theory of Everything”, portrayed by AMERICAN DIRECTOR and COMEDIAN CHRIS ROCK in “Top Five”, portrayed by AMERICAN DIRECTOR DAMIEN CHAZELLE in “Whiplash”, by AMERICAN DIRECTOR ED ZWICK in “Pawn Sacrifice”, portrayed by AMERICAN DIRECTOR AVA DUVERNAY in “Selma”, portrayed by AMERICAN DIRECTOR CLINT EASTWOOD in “American Sniper”, by CANADIAN DIRECTOR PHILLIPPE FALARDEAU in “The Good Lie”, and by CANADIAN DIRECTOR JEAN-MARC VALLEE in “Wild.”

A Quick Read

Over the past 50 years I’ve read books and articles on “the science and psychology of becoming a success.”

For a quick read on those topics, I recommend that you read all the articles in the Winter 2015 issue of SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN and the article on “emotions” in the January/February 2015 issue of PSYCHOLOGY TODAY which confirm what I’ve read elsewhere about what it takes to be an outstanding success.

These articles confirm, as indicated in the movies listed above, that there is no shortcut to success.

You have to put in time, effort and sweat equity.

Successful people have a long attention span, the ability to concentrate, the ability to be attentive, a passion for what they are doing, fanatical devotion to their craft, their motivation is internalized.  They care about what they are doing for its own sake.

They look at disappointments and setbacks as opportunities to learn and as challenges.

Being born a creative genius or with an enormous talent is not enough to produce an outstanding result – it takes a village to produce an outstanding result.

All students need a combination of the right teacher or coach, the right guidance, challenge, the right instruction and feed-back and never-ending practice or study.

In addition to other traits, highly successful people have a positive attitude, a fierce drive, passion and grit; they are persistent, they have the ability to focus, and they have mental toughness, optimism and emotional control.

Excellence is about grappling with tasks beyond current limitations and falling short again and again.

Excellence is about stepping outside the comfort zone, training with a spirit of endeavor, and accepting the inevitability of trials and tribulations.

Highly successful people are motivated individuals who don’t give up when something goes wrong.

Their progress and success is built, in effect, upon the foundation of taking risks and the necessary failures that follow.  That is the paradox of their outstanding successful performance.

A Personal Note

I try to have strong personal relationships with people who give me emotional support and who are obsessed about the same things I am obsessed about.

On Valentine’s Day (February 14, 2015) a friend sent me the following note:

“Nothing worse than boredom!! Even torture is more interesting.”

The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club

I’ve started a “Thoughtful Person Club.”

To join “The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club” send your name and e-mail address to me via the Internet at GSmolker@aol.com.

According to WordPress, in 2014, people in 108 countries viewed the “Gary S. Smolker Idea Exchange Blog” at http://www.garysmolker.wordpress.com.

Conclusion

Negative emotions can do a critical job for you.

You only have so much time and energy and you can’t give 110% to everything.

You need priorities and that means that most activities will get 0% or slightly more of your time and energy.

Negative emotions can help you decide what to spend your time and energy on.

Every negative emotion orchestrates a complex suite of changes in motivation, physiology, attention, perceptions, beliefs and behaviors that can make you a “winner” by giving you the motivation, energy, resolve, drive, emotional strength, mental toughness, will power and fortitude necessary to complete whatever you set out to do.

Perhaps the recent actions of ISIS will prompt a worldwide reaction that will shock people out of their “do nothingism.”

Look at what ISIS burning a Jordanian pilot alive prompted the King of Jordan to do.

Look at what ISIS beheading Egyptian Coptic Christians prompted the President of Egypt to do.

When people are made to become extremely mad (outraged) it prompts them into taking action.

 

Copyright © 2015 by Gary S. Smolker

 

 

A Serious Conversation On How To Be A Success And Happy At The Same Time (Part One) – by Gary S. Smolker

Introduction

My friends keep me constantly engaged in honest and heartfelt conversation – via e-mail – about serious and fundamental things.

The author of each e-mail gives pointers (shares his or her ideas) on how everyone who wants to enjoy success and happiness should “follow-through” in performing a few simple tasks in their daily lives.

Below are redacted copies of a few of those e-mails.

The first of the redacted e-mails that follow gives the bare outline of what the author sincerely believes one ought to do to be a success and happy at the same time.

The other redacted e-mails which follow in this article contain comments on the ideas expressed in the first e-mail (copy below) and expand upon the ideas set forth in the first e-mail.

Below is a list of the dates and subject matter of each of the redacted e-mails shared with you in this article.

Table of Contents & Index to the Smorgasbord of Ideas Exchanged in the Copies of E-Mails Which Follow

First E-Mail (dated January 27, 2015) sets forth, in less than 100 words, “Golden Rules for Success.”

Second E-Mail (dated January 27, 2014): Praise of the “Golden Rules for Success.”

Third E-Mail (dated January 28, 2015): Supplement to “Golden Rules”

Fourth E-mail (dated January 28, 2015): The need to have a purpose in life

Fifth E-mail (dated January 28, 2015): “Love what you do”

Sixth E-mail (dated February 4, 2015): What an individual needs to do to achieve great things and to build a stronger future

Seventh E-mail (dated February 4, 2015) Asks the question: “What better fits your busy schedule, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day?”

Eighth E-mail (dated February 4, 2015): Devoting Time To Your Real Passions

Ninth E-mail (dated February 5, 2015): Taking Chances

I. “Golden Rules for Success”

E-mail sent Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 8:12 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (PST) to GSS:

Gary-

One doesn’t need 9,600 words to describe or explain how to be a success and be happy at the same time.. God told us to Obey Him and leave all the Consequences to Him… He also said that we reap what we sow, more than we sow and later than we sow…  We basically have 2 choices in life… follow the Flesh and reap all of it’s “rewards” which are temporary, or follow the Spirit and reap His rewards that are long (eternal is a long time) lasting .. one cannot serve two masters.. one can’t be on two opposing roads at the same time and once cannot serve someone or something (I know there were 2 double negatives)… you might call it yin-yang or good vs evil but we cannot be in two different and opposing places at once…  So sow success – be generous and kind and trustworthy and happy towards others and you shall reap success which will bring happiness.. and more than you sowed!

Mo

II.  Compliments on Job Well Done

E-mail sent Tuesday, January 27, 2025 at 8:48 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) to GSS

Mo says it so well.!

Ray

III.  Comment on Job Well Done and My Experience with Mo

Ray,

Mo is brilliant.

Mo gets right to the point.

Mo identifies the issue, explains the choices and comes to a “rational”/ logical conclusion.

I totally agree with Mo’s point that the first requirement for becoming a success and happy is to have a reason for getting out of bed in the morning, i.e. it is necessary (a) to have a purpose in life, (b) to have a purpose for living.

I also totally agree with Mo’s second point that it is necessary (a) to have a positive outlook, (b) to see yourself as a work-in-progress, (c) to be willing to deal with difficulties, (d) to be an individual who believes he or she can change and grow, and (e) to believe that the more you labor at something the better you get at it.

The reasons I totally agree with the points made above is because I believe:

  • The mind is a learning machine.  
  • We are agents of our own development.
  • People may differ in intelligence, talent and ability, but great accomplishment, and even what we call genius, is typically the result of years of passion and dedication and not something that flows naturally from being born “smart” or with a “talent.”

My first interaction with Mo occurred 30 years ago. 

I called Mo out of the blue to discuss a problem.

Mo did not know me, but knew the person who had given me Mo’s name and phone number.

In spite of not knowing me, Mo was kind and generous towards me and made it clear that she was happy to help me.

About twenty years later, I had my second contact with Mo.

Since then I have had many pleasant contacts and interactions with Mo.

Mo has always been kind and generous towards me and has always expressed her genuine happiness to be doing whatever I asked her to do.

Gary

IV.  Work At What You Love And You Will Love Your Work

E-mail sent on January 28, 2015 at 8:40 a.m. PST to GSS

Sounds good and I believe he’s correct.

I also preach “work at what you love and you will love your work.”

It does not matter much what one chooses to do for their life’s work as long as they love what they are doing, they will have a happy life and enjoy their work.

When that happens success happens and when success happens happiness happens.

So, be happy in your work, love your work and you will enjoy life.

Being helpful and generous to others brings great joy to the giver.

It’s not all about “me me me.”

Share your happiness and success!

Paul

V. “Love What You Are Doing”

Paul,

I couldn’t agree more with you.

You have to love what you are doing.

Here is what Basketball Hall of Famer John Stockton, has said about that:

“Much of my success has come from many hours of hard work, but I readily admit practice was most often fun, and never a drudgery for me.

” You have to love what you are doing.

According to Stockton, in his teenage years that meant, “you’d rather give up going out on Friday night to go shoot the ball, even if it’s by yourself at the gym or on the courts at the park.

“I spent many lonely Friday and Saturday nights shooting, sometimes in a snowy driveway.

“I made many, many mistakes during games and you have to see past those as a leader.  You can’t say, ‘Oh my’, and pout about how poorly you shot or what kind of pass you made.  You have to look forward and then try to share that with your teammates if they start pouting.  I’d say ‘Come on, we got the next one; pick us up.’

“I was able to forget my mistakes and other people’s mistakes and continue to advance.

“My dad’s philosophy on life remains key; ‘It’s not how many times you get knocked down, but how many times you get back up that matters.’

“It’s those kind of traits that you can’t teach.  And really, that’s the key, you love it so much you want to stick with it.”

Stockton entered the Hall of Fame in 2009.

Stockton was on the 1992 and 1996 Olympic gold medal U.S. basketball teams.

He holds the NBA all-time assist record –

  • 15,806 assists, the most in NBA history,
  • 1,164 in one season, still tops, and 
  • 14.5 per-game assist average in one season, also a record.

Here is what his coach Frank Layden at Utah Jazz has said about Stockton, “Nobody thought he was going to be this good.  But the thing was, nobody measured his heart.”

VI.  What Individuals Must Do Achieve Great Things And To Build A Stronger Future

E-mail sent on February 4, 2015 at 9:49 a.m. to GSS

Gary,

I believe everyone is capable of achieving great things.  

We are all part of a large and diverse society which has achieved magnificent things in the past couple of thousand years.

Everyone can find something productive they are good at and they enjoy doing.

I believe if we are to build a stronger future there are two things that have to happen before we can truly achieve a state of serenity.

First and most importantly, I think we need to accept that the mold of how to be successful is presented to us at a very young age may not always be the right path for everyone.

This mold of do well in high school so you can get to a good college and make something of yourself is an illusion which sets a standard that not everyone is willing or wanting to meet.

I myself have friends with masters degrees in different fields and they regret going down that path and getting into all this debt for the promise of a better future which is not necessarily true.

We need to understand and accept that everyone has a different outlet and that we are not all the same.

Let our kids choose who they are.

We have no right making these decisions for them.

What I propose is once a student reaches 11th grade, let him choose a field (arts, design, engineering, etc.) and prepare them to become successful in this field.

Give them classes that will prepare them for their college classes in that field or for that field itself.

The second step to making our society stronger is really valuing our education and its power and effects.  

We currently live in a society where one may put off getting an education because of the expense of it.

If we want a stronger future, we need a better education system that educates everyone.

Take a note from other countries that pay their students to go to school and be educated.

This is a very rough idea of what we should do to better our future.

I truly believe that if we all try to make this world a nicer place to be in every day, then trying “to save the world” may not be as difficult as we make it seem.

Thank you for your time.

VII.  What Better Fits Your Busy Schedule – Exercising One Hour A Day Or Being Dead 24 Hours A Day?

Or,

Thank you for your reply to my question, “How can we build a stronger future?”

I throughly agree with what you have said:  Everyone deserves to receive an appropriate education, including giving children in school an opportunity to flex their intellects.

Although the goal of education in the U.S. is for all children to maximize their potential, the focus of funding has primarily been on the most vulnerable children, such as those with disabilities, who are rightly guaranteed a free appropriate education.

Today researchers, policy makers and teachers pay little to no attention to high-achieving students.

Many such students spend their days in school unchallenged – not being stimulated, or “learning” material they have already mastered.  They are bored to death.

This country, and the world, needs to develop its human resources to the full.

The failure to develop talented students means that fewer of them will become future innovators of products and services; creative thinkers to solve major social, economic, technological and environmental problems; or performers writers directors set directors musicians, etc. to entertain, inspire and soothe our souls.

If we are to nurture a cadre of capable leaders, we must commit to gifted education instead of assuming that academically gifted children will be successful no matter what their educational environment.

Lucky for me, I was in high school in 1957, when Sputnik took the world by storm.

The launch of Sputnik (by the Soviets) prompted the U.S. government to fund extra educational enrichment programs which infused attention and resources to talented youth – through the National Defense Education Act.

I benefited from that.

While in high school, in Palm Springs, California, through the National Science Foundation, at no expense to me or to my family, I attended a summer program at Cal State Northridge, at which I met other high school students from all over the state of California – one of whom became a life long friend.

Also, while in high school, at no expense to me or my family, I attended a National Science Fair competition in Albuquerque New Mexico, at which I met other high school students from all over the United States.

I was given special educational opportunities while in college: I was provided with a laboratory in which to work on my “own” research project at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory in Berkeley, California while I was an undergraduate attending the Berkeley campus of the University of California.

Additionally, Proctor & Gamble gave me a high paying summer job – between my junior and senior years as an undergraduate student at UC Berkeley – as a “trouble-shooter” on projects Procter & Gamble designed for me to work on in Procter & Gamble’s manufacturing plant in Sacramento, California.

In the summer between graduating from UC Berkeley and attending Cornell University as a graduate student, the U.S. Navy employed me at a high paying summer job at the U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory in Silver Spring, Maryland.

I have no doubt that a key to developing talent may lie in giving students lots of opportunities to pursue their interests.

A 19th century German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said, “Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see.”  

I’ve seen that play out in various jobs I’ve had during the past fifty years.

For more than fifty years, I’ve seen exceptional thinkers successfully launch their arrows into the unknown.

Not one of them was/is afraid to fail. 

They all all succeeded tremendously.

The progress of the world depends almost entirely on education.

You can get your education from the college of hard knocks or elsewhere.

I personally do not believe in coloring by the numbers solutions to novel difficult problems.

I am a strong proponent of experience that helps form good judgment and constant purposeful training/learning.

Recently, one of my more vibrant friends – concerned about how many hours a day I work and who believes that I work non-stop seven days a week – sent me a card which reads, “What fits your busy schedule better, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day?”

 VIII.  Actions And Inactions Produce Results

Email sent February 4, 2015 at 11:32 p.m. PST

“What fits your busy schedule better, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day?”

That is actually very interesting.

Some people may actually choose the latter and not even realize it.

It’s sad to see how little time people devote to their true passions, living a life that may seem busy and happy but is actually empty and lacking all life and color, not due to what their schedule looks like but what they seem to be doing (or not doing) with that time.

Or maybe I’m reading into it too much.  

Either way, it is an interesting statement.

Thank you for your time.

Please feel free to send me more of these emails.

It’s been a while since I’ve been able to talk about these things on a serious level.

Sincerely,

Or

IX.  Taking Chances

I agree with you that many people don’t understand that they are making decisions by default – they are deciding whether or not to do something by default.

Here is how the author J. R. Rowling refusal to take chances:

“It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which case you have failed by default.”  – J.R. Rowling

The beauty of disappointment (failures) is that through disappointment you can gain clarity, and with clarity comes conviction and true originality.

Learning from your errors (failures and disappointments) can turn errors into stepping-stones to your success.

The world is moving and anyone who contents themselves with present accomplishments soon falls behind.

The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club

I’ve started a “Thoughtful Person Club.”

 To join “The Gary Smolker Thoughtful Person Club” send your name and e-mail address to me by e-mail at GSmolker@aol.com.

 

 

Copyright © 2015 by Gary S. Smolker